Showing posts with label Foundation Garments. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Foundation Garments. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 15, 2016

1913 Estes Dress Foundations Research

     I thought I would start working on the most time-consuming project first, and the Edwardian ensemble is going to take quite some time. Maybe not in construction, but definitely in research, as I haven’t done anything in this era before.
     The project will be called the "Estes Dress."
     My inspiration is Estes Park, founded in the early twentieth century and located less than an hour from where I live. The Stanley Hotel (yes, that Stanley Hotel) was finished in 1909, and the Estes Park Theatre, the oldest-operating movie theater in the western United States, was completed in 1913. I'm digging the color scheme of these buildings, and will probably replicate the colors and some architectural motifs in my design. 

The Stanley Hotel via enjoyestespark.com

Estes Park Theatre via historicparktheatre.com

 I’m aiming for a 1913 silhouette, and need to make an entire set of foundation garments, a dress, a hat, and need to find suitable shoes.
Loving the far right silhouette (via tuppencehapenny.co.uk)

Foundation silhouettes by year (via dentellesetmacramees.wordpress.com)

     First, I’ll start on my foundation garments, of which I am a little intimidated. I have two corset patterns at my disposal: the 1911 corset on page 86 of Waugh’s Corsets and Crinolines, and the 1914 corset on page 87 of Salen’s Corsets. The 1917 Austerity corset on page 91 of Salen’s book is also very similar in silhouette to both of the earlier examples, so that may be an option as well. The desired shape (though there were slight modifications year by year) was a svelte, willowy figure with a minimized waist to hip ratio. As I am super hippy (13" w/h difference), I hope I don't end up looking boxy and/or like a sausage. Fingers crossed on this, guys. 

1911 corset via Corsets and Crinolines page 86


1914 corset via Corsets page 86
1917 corset via Corsets page 91


     For the chemise, I may augment the Edwardian Underthings pattern from Folkwear Patterns, or I may just fudge one from scratch. 

image via pinterest
     I am quite hesitant to venture into this time period, as the fashion called for underbust corsets, and that freaks me out for some reason. I think I would feel awkward even with several layers over my chemise, though a bust improver or early brassiere might help. 
     
     Until next time!

     Meg

Friday, March 13, 2015

I Think I'm Obsessed . . . .

I have a fever. And the only cure --apparently-- is staymaking.
It's getting ridiculous at this point, because that's really all I do have. Aside from my Kaprifol Jacket and a couple of petticoats, my only quality garments should really be worn underneath other garments. 
I am in the process of making a Regency gown and a natural form walking outfit, but for now, I can't really wear my hard work outside.
Anyway, I'm in the midst of stash-busting, and I found a yard of this really pretty cinnamon worsted that I had picked up at B&T forever ago. What to do with a scant yard of fabric? Make a pair of stays!!!

I'm using a pattern drafted from Corsets and Crinolines (page 40), and am going to try my darndest at making these shoulder straps fit. The part I like most about this pattern is that there are only two pieces for the body; the shaping is created by the boning pattern. 



I'll be posting on my progress as I go. I am currently saving up for an adorable printed cotton from B&T, and plan on making an open gown once these stays are done!

Thanks for reading!
Meg


Sunday, February 1, 2015

Mid-Century Stays in Canvas and Leather


I have a new pair of stays!


Slowly but surely, I finished my mid-18th century stays. What started out as a sewing binge of foundation garments I wouldn’t need for Costume College '14 turned into me madly tacking on 300 inches of hand-pinked silk trim, and squeezing myself into some pretty ill-fitting old stays for the event. But c’est la vie. I have a better project list this year.
So the canvas stays were put aside very nearly done until I had recovered from CoCo'14.

            These stays diverge from my previous posts in that the boning channels are machined and boned in zip ties. If I ever make another pair, I’ll sew the channels by hand and use reed boning. The fit,  and overall shape are correct (the canvas is cotton and not quite time appropriate, but it has a great weight and strength in a price range I can afford at the moment), so I’m happy with them for now.

Materials:

I used the pattern in Costume Close-up for strapless stays, as I cannot stand tie-on shoulder straps. They always slip off my shoulders and poke out of necklines.
For the material, I used a rough, sturdy canvas. I had some fetch leather binding from Burnley & Trowbridge in my stash that I ended up using.
I cut out two sets of the pattern with a generous Seam Allowance and sewed the boning channels. I then sewed the panels together and whipstitched the seam allowances down. Once that was done, I used large zip ties and boned the entire thing. The eyelets were worked by hand.
After this, I started on the leather binding. I had read a few blog posts on costumers working with leather binding, and was expecting this to be a frustration-fest. I tested out a few different types of needles on the binding, and ended up using a long, thin millinery needle it passed easily through the leather, but would bend if I held it at the wrong angle. It was time consuming, but really worth it.
There was no way that I was going to cover the seams and then bind the stays, as it would have been incredibly thick, so I tacked them on after the binding was in place. 
                A floating linen layer was tacked on at the end.

End Result:
               

                They fit really well! I like the strapless design, and the overall silhouette achieved. I’m trying to get used to the fit of my jackets and striped gown over these, as they compress my bust by three inches and add an inch or two to my waist, whereas my old half-boned stays re-smooshed my shape, but didn't alter my measurements nearly as much.



Thoughts:

                Have you ever sewn with leather? What were your experiences?
                What are your thoughts on boning with zip-ties?

Thanks for reading!

Cheers!

-Meg

Sunday, January 18, 2015

What I Do Mindlessly While Watcing "Poirot": New Regency Short Stays

Hey, there.
   So, this doesn't technically meet the requirements of HSF'15 projects, as I did not complete it in the past two weeks, but it fits the project theme of "Foundations." I'm going with it.
I haven't been in a sewing mood as of late. But before this handicraft slump, I made something just for the heck of it.
   I know, it's weird. I had no pressing commitments, no event happening the next day. I just wanted something to occupy my hands other than flat patterning for class.
   Here they are: my Regency short stays!!!!





   I used this image as inspiration and a starting off point:

Image from Jane Austen's World


   I really liked the meshing of transitional stays and the ubiquitous short stay used today. I'm not incredibly endowed, and don't really have any figure-smoothing needs that would warrant a long stay (though they do make figures look incredible), so I wanted to go short. But I do have enough bust that I needed something more than a wraparound stay.
   This little guy seemed like the perfect fit. I added tabs to the bottom of the Sense and Sensibility pattern, so that there wouldn't be a hard line under my bust and at the Regency waistline.

Materials:
   I used some bleached linen that was lying around the stash, this super awesome fat quarter that was sort of mid 19th century, but looked a little like an indigo resist popular during the Regency. I used linen thread and some reeds cannibalized from an abandoned pair of late 18th-century prow-front stays.

Construction:
   The construction was similar to that of my 1790's stays, with two layers of linen with a boning between them, and a floating lining added after construction. I did add the lining before adding twill tape binding, just because I didn't have much in the way of lining fabric, and couldn't add SA to turn down the hem.

Thoughts:
   Well. I have recently lost a good deal of weight, and the stays are a little big, as evidenced in the pictures. I'm not swimming in them, but they are a little loose with the lacing edges touching. I may add some padding, or may just deal with the lack of intense lift I was hoping for. I could take them apart, but . . . who am I kidding. these are done; I'm not going to mess with them. And I do love the shape they give me. I'm almost done with a bodiced Regency petticoat, and am extremely excited to make a spencer and a shako. The day gown is necessary, of course, but I have the perfect striped velveteen for the matching spencer/shako combo and can't help but mentally jump ahead. I'm also painting shoes to match.

   Well, that's about it. I'll be posting next week about my bodiced petticoat!

   Cheers!
   Meg










Wednesday, September 17, 2014

An Old Mistake Means a New Pocket

After recuperating from CoCo’14 and the flurry of the new semester, I noticed that an old pair of pockets I had were chewed up.  The pocket slits also hadn’t been the easiest thing to get into at Costume College, making me have to twist around awkwardly to get at my wallet and phone. A new pocket was in order.

Research:

I took out my handy Costume Close-up by Linda Baumgarten, and flipped through to the construction of the embroidered pockets. I had sort of winged it with my previous pair, and wanted to get it right this time.
Many extant pockets are a single pocket on a waist tape. I wanted to try this, and decided on tying it to my left side, so my dominant hand could fish around for my keys or phone.

Victoria and Albert Museum
Reproducing the correct method of construction is what I find the most interesting and ultimately most rewarding in reconstructing historical clothing, and to my astonishment, the way I had constructed my previous pockets was completely incorrect. After searching through several additional images of extant pockets, realized my mistake: I had topstitched my binding to the edge of the pocket and pocket slit. On the Costume Close-up example, and several others, the binding was applied the same way that stay binding was applied. The right side of the binding was sewn through both layers of the pocket along the edge, and then flipped over and slip-stitched to the back.
 I decided that my thrashed, topstitched pockets had to go.

Museum Wales St Fagan's/Cardiff 

Materials:

I tried to use what I had on hand, which was some lighter weight white linen, and some indigo linen I had dyed when messing around with historical dye methods for class. The indigo hadn’t taken evenly, and looked almost like a batik. Indigo resist prints were extremely popular in the American Colonies in the mid-18th century, so this was the perfect opportunity to use a colorful, accurate binding.
The waist tape is white cotton, since Burnley & Trowbridge only has natural linen tapes  in at the moment. Extant examples of mid-century pockets have cotton waist tapes and cotton binding, so I didn’t feel that I was taking liberties. 100/3 linen thread was used for all of the stitching.
The pattern I used was from Costume Close-up.

Construction:

The pocket pattern is fairly standard for extant examples. I scaled up the drawing to 17” long by proportionate (about 8” across the top). My previous pockets were tiny, only about 10” long. I did have two, but they were still a pain to get into and barely contained my phone and keys and wallet.
A combination of running and backstitches were used for attaching the binding to the front of the pockets. Backstitches were used for the small reinforcement diamond beneath the pocket slit. Slipstitches were used for attaching the binding to the back of the pocket and attaching the waist tape.
The binding was cut on the Straight of Grain, as it saves fabric and is easily manipulated when hand-sewing. I cut two 1” strips equaling 75”, and then used my wooden creaser to make a ¼” double fold binding. I really recommend using a creaser instead of an iron when creating bias or binding out of natural fabrics; it saves fingers J
On my last pockets, the pocket slits had started to tear with my fumbling around and the yanking out of my keys and phone. The new slit is longer with the bigger overall size of the pocket, but I also wanted to add a reinforcement diamond to the bottom of the slit because the linen is on the lighter side.


A 2” diamond with a ½” slit down one corner was cut out and matched to the bottom of the slit on the pocket front. The Seam Allowance was turned down and backstitched to the wrong side of the pocket front. Reinforcement pieces beneath slit openings are common on shirts from the period, though I haven’t seen any on extant pockets. But if it were useful and saved fabric in the long run, it makes sense that they could have added it.  




The binding was then sewn to the pocket slit. Thread was whipstitched twice over the bottom of the pocket slit before continuing up the other side. The binding was folded over and slipstitched into place.
The pocket slit process was repeated along the outer edge of the pocket with the front and back of the pocket treated as one.





The waist tape was slipstitched to the pocket after finding the most comfortable spot along my side. The ends of the waist tape were finished, and the pocket was done!







End Result:











I love this pocket. The contrast of the white and indigo really pops, and the binding looks really clean. I think I’m going to make some more indigo-accented accessories, as I have a yard of the indigo linen left.
I’m actually glad that I had made that construction mistake. For me, the end garment is never what I love the most about a project; I like to learn about the construction materials and methods while also building up an awesome kit. And I'm trying to keep my eye on the average and mundane (but well-made) silhouettes and materials for my historical wardrobes. I just want to look like a normal person from the time, whether the garments are beautiful or plain. It would be quite an accomplishment to completely blend in if we ever figure out that whole time travel thing J

Thoughts:

What is your favorite part about historical costuming?
What costuming mistake have you learned the most from?

Thank you again for reading!

-Meg

Monday, July 14, 2014

A Pair of Stays

I’m on a sewing binge.
It’s pretty awful (by which I mean awesome, but making those around me fear for my social life and/or sanity). So far, these projects have been hand sewn, which means progress is slow-going.
                I’m finally posting my third HSF project, and have gone rogue. I’m off in my own land of stay-making.
                Here is my latest HSF challenge, “Under It All”:



                I’m in love. This garment is the first that I've ever been truly proud of.
                They’re made out of three layers of linen (not including the floating linen lining), sewn with 35/2 linen thread, and boned with ¼” cane. They are completely hand sewn.

Interior before lining was added.

                Each panel was sewn and boned independently, and then whip-stitched together. The panel seams were then covered with silk ribbon and the whole thing was bound in twill tape. Eyelets were worked by hand using 35/2 linen thread.


The tiny eyelets are probably my favorite detail on these stays.

Interior shot of tiny eyelets before lining was added.


                The illustration given for the pattern shows the shoulder straps attached to both the front and back of the stays, which I really like. I can’t stand the shoulder straps that are tied to the body; they’re bulky and tend to shift when I’m wearing them. It very well may be that I am making shoulder straps in a completely ridiculous and flappy way, so attaching them to the front and back is my new go-to method. I've found that it also helps wrangle my appalling posture.
 
 I set the horizontal and vertical bones between separate linen layers so friction wouldn't fray the reed.
 
                They are short in the torso because by this date they’re getting into transitional territory. The bottom stay edge (above the tabs) sits 2" above my natural waist. Because of their length, they won’t work with the 1780’s Zone Front gown, or the 1770’s Robe a l’Anglaise I’m planning (which means I've started making another pair of stays. That’s proper justification, right?)

                I bought 7 yards of organza to make a 1790’s round gown (and a fichu for my Zone Front), and am fiddling with a pattern for the open robe featured in both Arnold and Waugh, so these stays will definitely be worn.
                Because I had so much fun making these, I started making a new pair of 1770’s stays the next day.Yes, I know. I have a problem.

Half shot of stays, full shot of ostrich plume. 


The Challenge: #4 “Under It All”
Fabric: Linen
Pattern: Based on the 1790’s stays in Waugh’s Corset and Crinolines.
Year: 1790’s (can be taken into the very early 1800s)
Notions: 35/2 linen thread, ¼” cane, 1/3” twill tape, ¼” silk ribbon
How historically accurate is it: Probably 95-100%. I used historically accurate construction methods and materials. I’m actually quite proud of these.
First worn: Not out and about yet, but I have modeled them for my long-suffering friends.
How many hours to complete: Probably close to 30? I need to better document my time on my next project; making calculations based on the number of miniseries I go through is really not accurate.
Total Cost: Linen fabric was $14.00 for two yards, linen thread from the stash, cane $3.00, twill tape $2.00, silk ribbon $2.50. Total cost= $21.50


Wednesday, March 19, 2014

HSF Challenge #2: Innovation

Hi, there.

I have another challenge complete, and am pretty happy with the way it turned out.
For my challenge, I chose the innovation of the cage crinoline.
It definitely wasn't the first time that an artificial structure was used to support the petticoats of its wearer, both the farthingale and the pannier were hugely popular years before.
The real innovation was really the material that the "cage" was made out of: watchspring steel. Instead of caning or reed to hold out the skirts, thin bands of metal were used as support.
 I've had this bridal "hoop skirt" hanging on a peg in a dark corner of my room, and I'm frankly sick of the puffy white thing. So I took out the metal hoops, which were probably twelve feet long a piece, and gave my mom the petticoat for quilting squares.

Starting point.



Surprisingly long. 


I really like the look of colored undergarments (red cages, striped bustles, etc), so I used this pale blue and white striped cotton bias binding I have a ton of. I like the vaguely nautical look of the thing, even though it sorts clashes with my striped corset. But it goes underneath and no one really sees it :)
Well, anyway, here it is:

Worn with a chemise, corset and flannel petticoat.

One petti thrown over the top. I'll wear at least two under petticoats when I wear this. 


I used the cotton binding to cover the hoops, and fastened them all together with 1/2" cotton twill tape I found at this cute little quilting store near home ($0.20 per yard, I bought 30 yards, no joke).
I used Leimomi's hoop tutorial for reference, and made very good friends with my measuring tape. I decided on 5 hoops and 8 vertical tapes.
I sewed everything by hand, and it took probably 10 hours to complete from deconstructing the petticoat to finishing the waist tape. I will probably sew a piece of drill cloth between the bottom two hoops so I don't get my feet tangled in them. The hoop length is mid-shin, so I don't think it's necessary at the moment; I'll wait on the additional material and see if foot-tangling poses a legitimate problem.

The Challenge: "Innovation"
Fabric: striped cotton bias tape
Pattern: none, measurements based on The Dreamstress' Hoop Skirt Tutorial
Year: 1860
Notions: Cotton thread, 1/4" metal hoops, cotton twill tape
How historically accurate is it? Fairly; I researched the construction of cage crinolines and used fabric and notions that were readily available. The metal is probably too thick to be terribly accurate, but it achieves the same general appearance and skirt shape as extant examples. 
Hours to complete: Approximately 10 hours
First worn: For these pictures
Total cost: Striped cotton was given to me by a friend, thread was on hand, "bridal" hoop was $15, and 8 yards of twill tape ended up being $1.60. Total= $16.60. 

Friday, January 17, 2014

HSF Challenge #1: Make Do and Mend

   The past couple of weeks have flown by!
   My first challenge was definitely on the small side, and for good reason. I'm in the planning stages of constructing both an 1880's corset and a 1790's corset from Corsets and Crinolines. Because of that, I'm going to find things in my UFO pile that will fit into the challenges.
   I have the few remaining articles of clothing remaining in my reenacting wardrobe mended, though my corded petticoat will be an ongoing project.
   I mended some tears and wearing on my hand sewn drawers:
Some mending on the back of the waistband.

In all of their mended glory.

   My chemise only needed a few new stitches on the seams, though I did mend and cover the raveling inner shoulder seam with some twill tape:


   I added 6 rows to my corded petticoat and fixed my waistband and pleats:
The tighter channels are new. 

The plaid lining.

   Here are my undergarments together, along with my pillow ticking corset (Please forgive the lighting):






   The petticoat isn't done yet, but there is quite a bit of poof. With my other petticoats on, it looks quite nice. I ultimately want the cording to end about 12 inches from the waistband. I have some cords about 14" from the bottom, and then another 8" up from that. You can barely see them, but they're there.

   Here's the HSF info for my small start to a year of sewing:

The Challenge: "Make Do and Mend"
Fabric: cotton muslin; plaid cotton lining
Pattern: Laughing Moon Pattern #100 for chemise and drawers; none for the petticoat
Year: 1863
Notions: Cotton thread,  sisal cording
How historically accurate is it? Fairly; I used natural fibers and the pattern for the chemise and drawers look like several extant examples I've seen. My corded petticoat uses narrow cording sewn close together to provide body, and I've seen several examples of narrow corded petticoats. I'm not sure about the lining on the petticoat. I haven't seen any with a patterned lining, but I didn't have any cotton on hand other than this plaid. I figure a working-class woman would have used whatever she could get her hands on.
Hours to complete: About 5
First worn: For these pictures
Total cost: $0.00; everything was on hand.
   I think I'll probably start working on the cage crinoline I've been putting off making for the HSF Challenge #2: "Innovation".

Cheers!